age | AB | BA | BB | SO | R | RBI | HR | OBP | SLG | OPS | |
Borchard | 27 | 298 | .191 | 25 | 93 | 36 | 30 | 12 | .254 | .342 | .596 |
Gload | 29 | 307 | .293 | 25 | 51 | 34 | 64 | 8 | .346 | .433 | .779 |
Grieve | 29 | 270 | .259 | 44 | 74 | 31 | 36 | 8 | .363 | .411 | .774 |
Grieve's recent numbers actually aren't terrible; they're just not good enough for DH'ing, and he's apparently atrocious in the field. Borchard shouldn't be much competition -- I don't think I ever quite appreciated just how much of a bust he's been (though part could be lack of playing time). Like Drew Henson, he's now reconsidering his choice of sports, and is considering a return to football (he was QB at Stanford). Gload, on the other hand, could be a real threat to the 1998 ROY. He was injured basically all last year, but in 2004 (234 AB) he batted .321/.375/.479.
C'mon Grieve. You can do it. Throughout Spring Training I'll be giving updates on this Fierce Rivalry For The 25th Spot On A Team That's Not The Red Sox But Is Still Important Because It Involves Ben Grieve.
Grieve will win out...And then I will do everything in my power to get tickets to the games in which he plays at Fenway. Then, as we've ruined his career once before, shall I begin the run to do so once again...
ReplyDeleteEarl, sweet table. Man you're rockin' that html aren't you!
ReplyDeleteGo Ben Grieve!!!